System requirements
This topic contains specific recommendations for system requirements. Since every hosting environment is different, and every customer's Boundary usage profile is different, the following recommendations should only serve as a starting point from which your operations staff may observe and adjust to meet the unique needs of each deployment.
To match your requirements and maximize the stability of your Boundary controller and worker instances, it's important to ensure that you perform load tests and continue to monitor resource usage as well as all reported matrices from Boundary's telemetry.
Refer to Maintaining and operating Boundary for more information.
Note
All specifications outlined in this topic are minimum recommendations without any reservations towards vertical scaling, redundancy, or other site reliability needs, and without an understanding of your user volumes or their use cases in all scenarios. All resource requirements are directly proportional to the operations being performed by the Boundary cluster, as well as the end users' level of usage.Hardware sizing for Boundary servers
Refer to the tables below for sizing recommendations for controller nodes and worker nodes, as well as small and large use cases based on expected usage.
Controller nodes
Size | CPU | Memory | Disk capacity | Network throughput |
---|---|---|---|---|
Small | 2 - 4 core | 8 - 16 GB RAM | 50+ GB | Minimum 5 Gbps |
Large | 4 - 8 core | 32 - 64 GB RAM | 100+ GB | Minimum 10 Gbps |
Worker nodes
Size | CPU | Memory | Disk capacity | Network throughput |
---|---|---|---|---|
Small | 2 - 4 core | 8 - 16 GB RAM | 50+ GB | Minimum 10 Gbps |
Large | 4 - 8 core | 32 - 64 GB RAM | 100+ GB | Minimum 10 Gbps |
For each cluster size, the following table gives recommended hardware specifications for each major cloud infrastructure provider.
Provider | Size | Instance/VM types |
---|---|---|
AWS | Small | m5.large , m5.xlarge |
AWS | Large | m5.2xlarge , m5.4xlarge |
Azure | Small | Standard_D2s_v3 , Standard_D4s_v3 |
Azure | Large | Standard_D8s_v3 , Standard_D16s_v3 |
GCP | Small | n2-standard-2 , n2-standard-4 |
GCP | Large | n2-standard-8 , n2-standard-16 |
To help ensure predictable performance on cloud providers, we recommend that you avoid "burstable" CPU and storage options (such as AWS t2
and t3
instance types) whose performance may degrade rapidly under continuous load.
Hardware considerations
The Boundary controller and worker nodes perform two very different tasks. The Boundary controller nodes handle requests for authentication and configuration, among other tasks. The Boundary worker nodes are used to proxy client connections to Boundary targets and thus may require additional resources.
Depending on the number of clients connecting to Boundary targets at any given time, Boundary workers could become memory or file descriptor constrained. As new sessions are created on the Boundary worker node, additional sockets and ultimately file descriptors are created. It is imperative to monitor both the file descriptor usage and the memory consumption of each Boundary worker node.
Network considerations
The amount of network bandwidth used by the Boundary controllers and workers depends on your specific usage patterns. With regards to Boundary controllers, even a high request volume does not necessarily translate to a large amount of network bandwidth consumption. However, Boundary worker nodes proxy client sessions to Boundary targets, so the bandwidth consumption is highly dependent on the amount of potential clients, the number of sessions being created, and the amount of data being transferred in either direction to and from the Boundary targets.
It is also important to consider bandwidth requirements to other external systems such as monitoring and logging collectors. It is imperative to monitor the networking metrics of the Boundary workers, to avoid situations where the Boundary workers can no longer initiate session connections.
It may be necessary to increase the size of the virtual machine to take advantage of additional throughput in certain circumstances.
Refer to the following pages for provider-specific virtual machine networking limitations:
Network connectivity
The following table outlines the default ingress network connectivity requirements for Boundary cluster nodes. If general network egress is restricted, you must pay particular attention to granting outgoing access from:
- The Boundary controllers to any external integration providers (for example, OIDC authentication providers) as well as external log handlers, metrics collection, and security and configuration management providers.
- The Boundary workers to controllers and any upstream workers.
Note
If any of the default port mappings below do not meet your organization's requirements, you can update the default listening ports using the resource's listener stanza.
Source | Destination | Default destination port | protocol | Purpose |
---|---|---|---|---|
Client machines | Controller load balancer | 443 | tcp | Request distribution |
Load balancer | Controller servers | 9200 | tcp | Boundary API |
Load balancer | Controller servers | 9203 | tcp | Health checks |
Worker servers | Controller load balancer | 9201 | tcp | Session authorization, credentials, etc |
Controllers | Postgres | 5432 | tcp | Storing system state |
Client machines | Worker servers * | 9202 | tcp | Session proxing |
Worker servers | Boundary targets* | various | tcp | Session proxing |
Client machines | Ingress worker servers ** | 9202 | tcp | Multi-hop session proxing |
Egress workers | Ingress worker servers ** | 9202 | tcp | Multi-hop session proxing |
Egress workers | Boundary targets ** | various | tcp | Multi-hop session proxing |
* In this scenario, the client connects directly to one worker, which then proxies the connection to the Boundary target.
** In this scenario, the client connects to an ingress worker, then the ingress worker connects to a downstream egress worker, then the downstream egress worker connects to the Boundary target. Ingress and egress workers can be chained together further to provide multiple layers of session proxying.
Network traffic encryption
You should encrypt connections to the Boundary control plane at the controller nodes using standard PKI HTTPS TLS. This also means that you can use a simple layer 4 load balancer to pass through traffic to the Boundary controllers, or a layer 7 load balancer with no configured TLS termination.
Database recommendations
Boundary clusters depend on a PostgreSQL database for managing state and configuration. Ensure you are using a version of PostgreSQL covered under Boundary's supported version policy.
Each major cloud provider offers a managed PostgreSQL database service:
Cloud provider | Managed database service |
---|---|
AWS | Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL |
Azure | Azure database for PostgreSQL |
GCP | Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL |
Database network requirements
Boundary controllers must be able to reach the PostgreSQL database. If you use a high availability (HA) configuration, then the controllers must have access to the PostgreSQL server infrastructure. In non-HA configurations, the Boundary servers must have access. Worker nodes never need access to the database.
Database users and roles
After the database has been initialized, the database user for a Boundary controller requires only permissions for data manipulation operations (select, insert, update, and delete).
Database initialization requires elevated privileges.
When you initialize the database with the boundary database init
command, the Boundary database user requires the superuser
role plus all privileges
on the Boundary database.
Required PostgreSQL modules
Boundary has a dependency on the PostgreSQL pgcrypto module, which is one of the standard modules that is supplied with PostgreSQL. Refer to the PostgreSQL documentation for more information.
Load balancer recommendations
For the highest levels of reliability and stability, we recommend that you use some load balancing technology to distribute requests to your Boundary controller nodes. Each major cloud platform provides good options for managed load balancer services. There are also a number of self-hosted options, as well as service discovery systems like Consul.
To monitor the health of Boundary controller nodes, you should configure the load balancer to poll the /health
API endpoint to detect the status of the node and direct traffic accordingly.
Refer to the listener stanza documentation for more information.
Each major cloud provider offers one or more managed load balancing services:
Cloud | Layer | Managing load balancing service |
---|---|---|
AWS | Network | 4 |
AWS | Application | 7 |
Azure | Network | 4 |
Azure | Application | 7 |
GCP | Network/Application | 4/7 |
Boundary workers do not require any load balancing. Load balancing for the Boundary workers is handled by the Boundary controllers when clients initiate sessions to Boundary targets.